Your Work Is Great! Worthless!

I’ve been casting around to see if any national outlets want to pick up my story on Ron Wyden and the President, fighting over healthcare. I think it’s a great story that if anything would play better on the national stage than just right here in Oregon. During my pitch process I got a “yes” this morning from the editor of a prominent national politics blog. He wrote:

I can’t pay you anything, but I can give you front page access to push the story. This is exactly the sort of content we are looking for right now–pushing back against Democrats reluctant for reform.

I responded saying I was very interested in the byline but that lack of payment was surprising for such a prestigious website. I’d be willing to go ahead on a “test my work” basis if there’s the prospect of payment for further freelance work at some point, I wrote. He responded:

The likelihood to be paid for occasional writing is zero.

While you may find this surprising, neither The Huffington Post nor Daily Kos pay a single dime for occasional work, either.

There is no business model for occasional freelance writing on blogs. I wish it were otherwise, but it is not.

I responded:

Consider my perspective: You, the editor of a nationally influential website, have told me my story is exactly the sort of content you’re looking for. I couldn’t be more flattered. Sincerely. Yet I’ve invested five years of hard work in getting to the point where I’m capable of pitching you such a story, and you now tell me that not only will I go uncompensated for that effort, but that there is no prospect of ever being paid for it, in the future.

Why would any writer ever accept the terms of such a bargain? Isn’t it bound to slowly kill good journalism?

Graciously, he responded, telling me “we can have a larger discussion about the state of journalism, which I think would be very interesting,” but said his specific website, while influential, national, prominent, yadda yadda, well: “those adjectives do not cause our bank account to magically increase in size.” He continued:

“We just had a fundraiser two weeks ago the prevented us from going under. As I said, I hadn’t paid myself for five months. We now have enough operating capital to last another four months. During this time, for the first time, we will finally be able to start paying all of our full-time writers, including myself, about $40 per article. I am hoping to secure other deals that will keep us going through November, at which time we will probably need another fundraiser. However, none of the four deals I am looking into have been secured at this time.”

For about half a minute I felt guilty even asking for money in the first place. Then I thought, maybe I should ask for $40 like the big boys. After a further 30 seconds I just took my pitch elsewhere.

It’s disheartening to realize that not only am I going to have to sell national editors on my stories themselves but also, on whether or not they should actually pay me for them. On one level I feel like a complete asshole for saying no to this fella. But I’m not buying the “front page access” line. He may be broke but I don’t see that exploiting occasional writers is going to earn him any money in the long run. I think his business model needs to change. And I think mine may need to, too.

It’s enough to make me want to move to Hollywood and cover celebrity gossip for TMZ: “Your work is meaningless, it’s bullshit! Total bullshit! Here’s $3,000!”

6 responses to this post

  1. Kevin -

    Why is his inability to run an – ahem – sustainable business model any of your concern?

    Thank you for the nice words. But I only donate my work to charitable causes, not to for-profit Web sites and publications. Best of luck with the deals you’re seeking.

    — Matt Davis

  2. shane -

    Welcome to the world of photograhy. I get people that love my work, want to use it for one thing or another but they can only give me credit. A byline will not pay for my gear or put food on the table.

  3. matt -

    Yeah. I used to work as a photographer’s assistant: It’s where I learned there that you have to be clear about payment before completing a job.

  4. Texas Triffid Ranch -

    And now you understand why I left writing for horticulture. A friend of mine, who was a rather successful artist on the East Coast, finally blew up and quit when he had yet another dolt blow smoke up his ass about his “greatness”, and then demanded free work so “you can pay your dues”. Joey asked, quite rightly, “I’ve been a published artist for twenty years. At what point do I no longer have to pay my dues?”

    Incidentally, I watched the same exact thing happen in microcosm when the science fiction magazine market imploded and so many of them moved to the Web. It’s bad enough that most of those magazines paid at 1935 levels if they paid anything at all, but then they slipped to the Web and cried poverty when anyone asked for compensation. I predict that the rest of online journalism is going the same way as these did: a lot of good, talented folks jumped in to participate at the beginning, but after a while, the lies of how they’d get paid one of these days got tiring. These days, the only ones who remain are the egomaniacs who are happy to have multiple publications printing the same goddamn column over and over, even if it’s for free, and the writers who simply can’t get published anywhere else. Of course, when someone suggests that maybe paying writers might get a corresponding increase in quality submissions, out comes the whines about not being a trust fund kid. It was old in 1989, and it’s old now.

  5. Texas Triffid Ranch -

    Oh, and Shane? I understand all too well, because writers are treated the same exact way. That’s why I’m fond of the joke “What’s the difference between a Creative Commons writer and a pizza? A pizza can feed a family of four.”

  6. Will Radik -

    Suddenly wondering what Paris Hilton is up to. Hmm…

Leave a Reply

Got something to say? Let me know.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>